Dhayadevadas is business competitor - Documents and export does not comes under the purview of Mining Law

In fact, Export of Minerals does not comes under the purview of MMDR Act. This has been confirmed by Govt., of India, Ministry of Mines also which is given below.

Indian Garnet Sand Company Private Limited - On the Article of Association page 11, reflects the Directors Name.

Sri. D.Dhayadevadas and his wife G. Jebakani and R.Dhanukodi Athithan (Member of Parliament) and his wife Indira Devi. Four persons are share holder and Director.

In the Southern Enterprises Mr.Dhayadevadas and Dhanuskodi Athithan wife Indira Devi are partners.

Since Dhanuskodi Athithan is Congress MP and Congress Central Minister, he use his political clout to give trouble to V.V.Mineral, their business competitor.

From the beginning his allegation is illegal mining. The DGM letter which establish that there is no lease to Southern Enterprises. But his allegation is only against V.V.Mineral.

To Usurp VVM Customers, Dhayadevadas make false complaints - Here is the document

Their letter dated 29.07.89 addressed to one Korean customer. Along with the letter he enclose copy of letter received from Director Geology and Mining, addressed to one M.P. R.Dhanuskodi Athithan in which the DGM mentioned that total 4 mining leases in Tamilnadu granted

1) Kumari Minerals

2) Beach Mineral Sand Company

3) & 4) T. Manikam

In the above said letter he asked to capture the V.V.Mineral customer telling that V.V.Mineral is doing illegal mining without any mining lease, as V.V.Mineral name is not reflected in DGM letter. While clarifying to the Korean customer V.V.Mineral mentioned that for trading and export no mining lease is required and southern Enterprises (owned by Dhayadevadas) name also not mentioned in the DGM list. 

We are strong political power and we can control any person in India - Dhayadevadas claim In South Korea - Confirmation Telex Attached

A brief back ground about the complaint made against VV Mineral is given below.

There are false complaints against V.V.Mineral, which are spread by Mr. Dayadevadas who is also doing in the same business. The following will establish the motive started from 1988

1.     Telex message send by Korean customer during 17th May 1989 send to Telex PCO, Nagercoil, Head post office.

Kindly note the below wording :

“Mr. Dayadevadas of Southern Enterprises is visiting to Seoul to make order with Mr.R.Dhanuskodi Athithan who is member of Parliament (Lok Shaba) and his wife is also partner of this company ........

FYI they saying they have strong political power in India and can control all makers in India and please check and advise whom they are.”

VV Mineral paid royalty and transported 98 Lakhs M.Ton from 2000 to 2013 with valid transport permit through there is no need to get permit

VV Mineral competitors who involved large scale illegal mining and determined the mining leases for various violations, to damage VV Mineral, simply file a PIL through their henchmen with wild allegations and arrange to publish the same in media through some paid news reporters by making wild allegations against State and Central government officials also. Their main aim is to prejudice the judiciary and to make fear in the minds of State and Central Govt., officials. So they publish the same, whenever some cases are listed for hearing. In fact, our competitors have send complaint more than 40 times, every time either State Govt., or State and Central Govt., officials jointly inspected, verified the records and submitted report that all the allegations are false.

In fact, VV Mineral securely keep the monazite under the institutional control of AERB. This has been confirmed by the Honorable Minister. The entire product of VV Mineral are exported through Tuticorin Port. Hence if the export figures are obtained from Tuticorin Customs, we can find out the exact quantity of mineral exported. All the transport permit details with permit number quantity etc., for 98 lakhs M.Tons from 2000-01 to 2013 are available with VV Mineral. This will establish how much we have been transported with valid transport permit and how much balance quantity available with VV Mineral.

Once the minerals are removed from the earth on payment of royalty, the State Govt., has no control over the same. This has been confirmed by the Honorable Supreme Court in Tamilnadu State Vs. Kaveri Chetty case. Hence the Govt., cannot control the minerals removed from Mine and transported with valid transport permit to VV Mineral factories.

Like that for sale of mineral, there is no need of transport permit - This has been confirmed by the Seven Star enterprises Vs. District Collector Karur case by the Madras High Court division bench.

VVM's total export is only 62 Lakhs M.Ton. Balance 36 Lakhs M.Ton royalty suffered material is with VVM

In the approved mining plan itself, the lessee has to mention the method of mining and the method of processing etc., which was duly approved by Govt., of India itself. In the MCR, 2016, it is specifically mentioned that in case the minerals are processed outside the lease area, the royalty to be paid for ROM by calculating the heavy mineral percentage.  The above said rule further specify that, while transporting the mineral from the lease area, the lessee has pay the royalty for tentative quantity and at the time of finalization of royalty accounts in the year end, the difference of royalty to be remitted. Hence in case any variation in terms of royalty, it has to be collected at the time of settlement of royalty account at year ending. Moreover the royalty accounts will be scrutinized by the Accountant General and if he found any short collection, it will be collected from the lessee as directed by the Accountant General. 

All the VV Mineral mining leases are within the CRZ area. Hence Govt., of India impose a condition that, the processing plant should be outside the CRZ area. Accordingly VV Mineral erected the processing plants outside the CRZ area and remit royalty well in advance. From 2000 to 2013 VV Mineral transported total 98 Lakhs M.Tons of heavy mineral sands with valid transport permit to their processing plants. Till now they have exported only 62 Lakhs M.Ton alone and other quantities are available in the factories itself. Since these all are royalty suffered materials, the ownership goes to the lessee according to the Supreme Court Judgement in Kaveri Chetti case.

Due to Business rivalry, the people who could not able to compete with VV Mineral in terms of quality will make false complaints against VV Mineral. Whenever such complaints were received, the authorities will enquire about the same and reject the complaints.

The royalty is only for mineral not for raw sand - Govt., of India confirmation - Here is proof

As per the provisions of Section 9 of MMDR Act, 1957 royalty is payable at the rate prescribed in second schedule of the said Act only for the processed minerals and not for the residuary sand.  This statutory fact has been confirmed  by Govt. of India to the District Collector who in turn has communicated the same to the Commissioner of Geology and Mining.

There is no violation by beach mineral industries - Reply in the parliament confirm the same

When approaching for study of replenishment of minerals, Atomic Minerals division (AMD) and National Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT) replied that, they have no facility to carryout the replenishable study. Hence the preliminary study was carried out by the former State Director of Geology and Mining and again studied through Madras University and the reports were submitted to IBM for their reference.

There is no provision either in the MMDR Act or Rules framed thereunder or the mining lease deed to fix up the quantity of mineral permitted to  mine from a particular mine. The only requirement is the mineral consumed or transported should be royalty suffered under section 9 of MMDR Act. Moreover even if the mining quantity is more than the quantity mentioned in the approved mining plan, this does not comes under the purview of illegal mining. In case mining operation is carried out in a non lease hold area, then only it amounts illegal mining. In case, the production is more than the tentative quantity mentioned in the approved mining plan above the tolerance limit of 20% and if the lessee failed to get modified mining plan, it amounts violation of MCDR, 1988 and it does amounts illegal mining. This has been confirmed by the Honourable Minister in the Parliament.  Relevant portion is given below.

Beach Mineral Replinishable Mining is a permissible activity - Govt., of India High Level Committee report copy

Based on a complaint from Mr.Dhayadevadas, with a view to finding out the truth whether the beach minerals are replenishable or not in nature, Govt. of India constituted a committee under the Chairmanship of Mr.Nagar, Chairman (Retd), IREL and officials from AMD, NIOT, NIO and State Geological officials from Tamilnadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh.  The committee held several rounds of discussions and inspections and submitted a report to Govt of India.   According to their findings, it has been established that the beach sand minerals are replenishable in nature.   Besides, the report says that it is not an offence if the replenishable resources are legitimately exploited within their leasehold areas.  The report further enlightens the fact that it is not physically possible to make the precise quantification of the replenishable resources and even if any attempt is made to do so, it will not be an accurate one.  The report further recommends that the private consultancy of technically competent group may be entrusted with the responsibility of evaluation of replenishable beach minerals at regular intervals namely season to season.   Excerpts from Chapter-III of the above report is given below.

We regret having carried a one sided report - New Indian Express, Cochin Clarified

New Indian Express published a wrong news based on the inputs from one of our Company VV Mineral’s competitor from Kerala. By seeing the same, Mr.S.Vaikundarajan, Managing Director of VV Mineral send clarification about the news with relevant proofs and links. After verifying the fact Indian Express issued Clarification on 21.03.2018 in 6^th page.

They further mentioned that, “we regret having carried a one sided report”.  Thus Indian Express established that, they are keeping the ethics of the Journalism.  Our best wishes to  New Indian Express, Kerala. The clarification news and link is given below.

http://epaper.newindianexpress.com/1587027/The-New-Indian-Express-Kochi/21032018#page/6/1  

What ever mineral deposited in the lease area, VVM can mine - Govt., of India confirmation

Since these Beach Minerals are replenishable beach placers, the lessee can collect all the minerals irrespective of thickness and number of days and the only requirement is, the quantity etc., should be declared in the monthly return submitted by the lessee – This has been confirmed by Govt., of India, Deputy Controller of Mines, Indian Bureau of Mines, which is given below.