Back ground about the Paid News writer Sandhya
Ravishankars News - “The Countdown Begins For Tamil Nadu’s Beach Sand Mining
Cartel” published in Wire on 27.01.2017.
When
VV people start News 7 Channel, this Sandhya Ravishankar ask Head post to her
husband Ravishankar. She politely told unless the post is not given to her
husband, she will damage VV Mineral by writing against them. This can be find
out in letter dated 21.08.2014 goo.gl/KA6qQ5 VV Mineral news release entry goo.gl/rxM1e5 also establish the same.
The
entry dated 21.08.2014 speak about Sandhya as follows:
“One Santhiya threatening V.V.Mineral
management to give employment to her husband in the newly started TV channel.
She very politely threatened that otherwise she will publish anti
V.V.Mineral news in the media. Some mediators are negotiating between them.
Unless her demand is not meet out within one week “Santhiya” open her
month that, “India” is destroyed by V.V.Mineral, as, she has that much
affection in India and her husband”.
Will
it not established that, she is writing only on this enmity?
Since
VV Mineral refused to comply Sandhya demand, by colluding with VV Mineral
competitors, she published a news on 02.02.2015 in Economic Times as, his
husband is editor to the same. Immediately VV Mineral establish the management
about the motive and produced the documents. Hence they issue a clarification
in two line without publishing full version during May 2015 available on goo.gl/NoeXBd
VV
Mineral filed criminal case against Sandhya Ravishankar for publishing false
news, the criminal case against Sandhya Ravisankar is pending before judicial
magistrate Court No. 1, Tirunelveli as
CC NO. 37 of 2015. One more petition before the High Court also pending.
Again
with ulterior motive, Sandhya approached VV Mineral to publish such type of
false story vide her e-mail dated 31.08.2016 which was refused by VV Mineral
and copy marked to all the medias.
If
Sandhya is really an impartial reporter,
before she publishing this story, the above pending criminal cases and her
enmity with VV Mineral etc., and her friendship with Radhika, D/o. Sundaram,
IAS against whom VV Mineral filed criminal case etc., should be mentioned
either in the first para or in the bottom. But she did not mention the same.
Because she was a paid writer and she was paid by VV Mineral competitor
Dhayadevadas. Is it a fair news? Does she ready to refuse the same? Will the Press council not
take action against this type of reporters like Sandhya who create story for
money and motive?
Her
boss, Mr. Dhayadevadas the Illegal mining don looted beach minerals in huge way
more than 39 lakhs M.Ton. Details in goo.gl/kMg6DE
Not
only Sandhya Ravishankar, some Retd. IAS officer and other officers also in the
paid list of illegal mining don Dhayadevadas. The
nexus between them are available in video form goo.gl/203NFm
How
Sandhya get the D.O. letter send to Chief Secretary without any office seal or
without office copy? Who handover the same? Will this establish that Sandhya
also a gang member of the erred officers ?
How she get the letter? When she get the letter? Can Sandhya explain the same ?
Dayadevadas
gang member District Collector Ashish kumar created the false report for which
all the documents are available in goo.gl/JNebHD
VV
Mineral approached Government for prosecution against Ashish Kumar. see in goo.gl/gcxyI4
Based
on the above said false allegation, same Sandhya Ravishankar published a false
news in Economic Times on 02.02.2015.
With
this motive and enemity, now she published this false news. For which we send a
detailed mail, which is given below.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sakthi G <sakthi@vvmineral.com>
Date: Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 3:44 PM
Subject: Objection against news published in your e-paper by Sandhya Ravisankar on 27.01.2017
To: editorial@thewire.in
From: Sakthi G <sakthi@vvmineral.com>
Date: Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 3:44 PM
Subject: Objection against news published in your e-paper by Sandhya Ravisankar on 27.01.2017
To: editorial@thewire.in
Date : 28.01.2017
To
The Editor,
The Wire,
First Floor, 13, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Marg,
Gole Market,
New Delhi -110001
Sirs,
A news item has been published on 27.01.2017, in your e-paper as “The Countdown Begins For Tamil Nadu’s Beach Sand Mining Cartel” by Sandhya Ravishankar.
At first we want to highlight the motive between Sandhya and our company.
There is business enemity between Indian Garnet sand company and Sothern Enterprise operated by Mr. Dhyadevadas supported by Ex. Congress Central Minister Mr.Dhanuskodi Adithan and VV Mineral operated by Mr.S.Vaikundarajan. To capture VV Mineral customer this gang visited Seoul and meet VV Mineral customers. The telex message available inhttp://www.beachminerals.org/w
Again they made complaint against VV Mineral that, VV Mineral is doing illegal mining only to capture VV Mineral customer. You can see this also in the above link.
Mr. Dhayadevadas the Illegal mining don looted beach minerals in huge way more than 39 lakhs M.Ton. You can find out the same in http://www.beachminerals.org/w
This Sandhya did not open mouth against the same, since, she is a paid employee of illegal mining don Dhayadevadas. Mr.Dhayadevadas through some Retd. IAS officers, influenced Ashishkumar to create a false report against VV Mineral. The nexus between this educated criminals and Dhayadevadas are available in video form http://www.beachminerals.org/v
The D.O. letter send to Chief Secretary without any seal or without office copy, Sandhya attached with this article. This alone will establish that Sandhya also one of the gang member of this group. How she get the letter? When she get the letter? Can she explain the same ?
In respect of Ashishkumar report, it is a created one, created under the advise of some Retd. IAS officers you can find out the video mentioned above. Immediately we collected all the documents from the relevant officers and established that, Ashishkumar report is a created one. The documents are available in http://www.beachminerals.org/c
Based on the above said documents we approached the government for criminal prosecution against Ashish kumar, IAS. You can find the same in http://www.beachminerals.org/c
Based on the documentary evidences, the Vigilance and Anti corruption department got permission for detailed enquiry from Govt., of Tamilnadu and registered FIR against him and conducted the enquiry. It was published in all the news papers. You can find out the same in Deccan Chronical dated 21.6.14.
One Victor Raja Manikkam also in this gang. Their tactic is, they simply file a writ petition with false allegations and then, through paid reporters like Sandhya, they publish this as news. So that, this can be published without advertisement charges and thereby to make fear over VV Mineral customers. This is not a suo-moto PIL. But a bogus PIL filed by Victor Rajamanikkam a gang member of Sandhya Group, who was also in the same business.
Based on the above said false allegation, same Sandhya Ravishankar published a false news in Economic Times on 02.02.2015.
She published this type of news for the following three reasons.
1) She got regular remuneration from Mr.Dhayadevadas group to publish false news.
2) She demanded Head of the News 7 Tv Channel post which belongs to our group to her husband which was refused by our management. Hence she threatening that, unless the post is not given she will write against our company. You can find out the same inhttps://www.facebook.com/vvmin
“One Santhiya threatening V.V.Mineral management to give employment to her husband in the newly started TV channel. She very politely threatened that otherwise she will publish anti V.V.Mineral news in the media. Some mediators are negotiating between them. Unless her demand is not meet out within one week “Santhiya” open her month that, “India” is destroyed by V.V.Mineral, as, she has that much affection in India and her husband”.
3) Whenever a case is posed for enquiry before the High Court, to prejudice the judiciary and government and to turn them against us, she publish such type of false news.
We take up the matter to Economic times management and send legal notice. Finally on May 24-30, 2015 they published a clarification informing that the facts are not verified and published only based on the PIL affidavit. You can verify the same in goo.gl/NoeXBd
Since they did not publish our objection, we file criminal case against her and the newspaper for not publishing our side. The criminal case is pending before the Judicial Magistrate Court No. 1, Tirunelveli as CC No. 37 of 2015.
In this connection Criminal Miscellaneous petition no. 1645 of 2015 is also pending before the Honourable High Court of Chennai, Madurai bench.
Again with ulterior motive, she approach us to publish such type of false story vide her e-mail dated 31.08.2016. We have refused to give any information to her and we told that, she is paid writer - paid by our competitor vide our mail dated 31.08.2016 and mark copy to all the medias.
With this motive, now she published this false news.
In this connection, we want to clarify the same. All over the India, the tickers have been fixed to find out illegal mining. The ticker in Thiruvambalapuram and Vijayapathi village does not relating to VV Mineral and the show cause notice dated 09.01.2017 issued by the District Collector also does not relating to us. These all relating to Industrial Mineral Company (IMC) as reported by her.
Regarding the contention about the amicus curiae Mr.V.Suresh argument and memos etc., since the matter is pending before the court, we cannot tell anything about the same.
She published a list of mining lease companies and pointed out that some companies belongs to Mr.S.Vaikundarajan’s brother. But cunningly she failed to mention that, Mr.Chandresan and Mr.Sukumar have no business relationship and they have lot of litigations among them and even now also some matters are pending before Arbitrator / Retd. Supreme Court Judge, nominated by the Honourable Supreme Court. Like that, she mentioned that more than 53 mining leases belongs to Mr.S.Vaikundarajan company. But she wantonly, with ulterior motive ignored that out of 53, total 49 mining leases are their own patta land. Only four mining leases alone in government land, whereas, Mr.Dhayadevadas having 11 mining leases all are government land.
When lot of mining leases are having, what is the necessity for illegal mining.
She mentioned that, Mr.S.Vaikundarajan operating Tamilnadu and Andhra Pradesh and she wantonly forget to mention that Mr.Dhayadevadas also having operation inMaharashtra state as, he is her boss.
Like Mrs.Sandhya, who wrote with enemity and for money, we have some enemity with some officials. That is why we approached the High Court to nominate any other State High Court Judge to inspect and submit report, as, there is no possibilities of political influences.
We are not afraid for the inspection. But we are afraid for the officials who will submit false reports as, our competitors have strong political power and their team, including Retd. IAS, IPS officials, High Court Judges, Law officers etc., to seeding false news against us and thereby make prejudice of the judiciary.
Regarding Ashish Kumar transfer, after he got transfer order, he create the false report that is why we approach for prosecution with documentary evidences as explained above.
Regarding Bedi Commission report, when he was Sub Collector, Cheranmahadevi, we have some problem and we have filed criminal case against him and filed petition before the National Human Right Commission and filed contempt petition before the Honourable High Court. Our fear is since now he can make revenge us by submitting false report against us just like Sandhya Ravishankar who wrote false article of close to 40,000 Crore worth minerals have been exported during 2013 to 2016. That is why we approach the Honourble High Court to appoint other state judge for inspection and report. Now the matter is pending before the Honourable High Court.
Regarding the FIR at Thattarmadam, it does not relating to us and we have no comments.
Regarding another FIR in Ovari police station, definitely we will face it in accordance with law and establish that, we are not carryout any illegal mining.
Regarding building plan permission etc., we have all the statutory required permissions. But when the government machinery misuse their power, it is very hard and lengthy process to establish that we are innocent and this action is taken with ulterior motive. We will establish the same in Court of law, since the matter is pending before court, we cannot reveal the facts.
It is pertinent to point out here that, according to the District Industrial Centre figure, in Radhapuram and Vallioor Union total 780 running industries are available with electric power more than 25 HP. Whereas, the Radhapuram BDO granted license for 17 and Vallioor BDO granted license for 30. The District Collector did not take action against other violated companies, but he take action only against Mr.S.Vaikundarajan company. Is it not a motivated one?
Does Sandhya Ravi shankar open the mouth against the partial action?
She has published one statement that, illegal mining and export after the ban, it is not correct. Really, we have exported the existing stock which is legally mined and transported on payment of advance royalty. We have all the details and we will face the charge.
At any time, Mr.S.Jegatheesan did not accept he guilty. But he submit one representation that, to avoid damage to the vehicle by delaying the release, he is ready to remit the amount ordered by the District Collector. Unfortunately, with ulterior motive, it was referred to District Committee which has no authority to decide and refused by the committee. We have filed revision before the competent authority. It is pertinent to point out here that, last three years, more than 500 major mineral lorries were seized by the authorities in the district. All the lorries were released by the District Collector after collecting the penalty and compounding fees. The only case, not compounded and referred for filing FIR is Ovari Crime No. 83 of 2016. To the best of my knowledge, there is no discretion power given to District Collector or District Committee to decide this case, at his vim. We will agitate this in proper forum.
There is a proverb in Tamil that, “If the distributer is our man the person in last of row will get sweet rice”. This will show the illegal action by the customs commissioner. When we approach the customs authority, they simply told that, we cannot do anything, since the District Collector Tirunelveli requested and drafted the public notice. Though there is no provision under the Foreign Trade Development Act to issue such type of public notice, to satisfy the District Collector, the Customs department issued the public notice.
Regarding Sandhya’s discussion about the transport permit, the transport permit is required to transport the mineral from the mine. When it is processed at a factory, there is no need to get transport permit. Is the steal gate produced from Iron ore required transport permit? Is the blue metal used for construction of bridges and houses, road etc., need transport permit?. Not required. But since the District Collector and Deputy Director of Mines, Tirunelveli aim is Mr.S.Vaikundarajan, the merchandise item sold with valid invoice also seized and FIR registered which is not followed in other cases.
In fact, export of mineral does not comes under the purview of MMDR Act. Only mining of minerals comes under the purview. But since Mr.S.Vaikundarajan is targeted, the Govt., ofIndia clarification was ignored by the District Collector, as, there is constitutional protection to them even if they do anything, they can simply escape that this action is taken on good faith. Reporters like Sandhiya and Media like yours also will support such type of actions.
Even though Export of Mineral does not prohibited or banned by the State Government, all of a sudden, the District Collector take action with some motive. The same District Collector knows the export and he has reported that this much were exported on year by year even after the stoppage of mining operation during 2013.
Regarding interim order on various courts, 59 Nos., even though it is not relating to this issue and even though there is no interim orders, on the cases, for a clarity, we have already filed memo to withdraw the cases.
We deny the illegality. Yes. We are ready to establish that no illegal mining is carryout and the report is prepared behind our back by Gagandeep Singh Bedi without following principles of natural justice. Some Retd. IAS and IPS officials are behind the plan. When Gagandeep Singh Bedi himself recorded a video, while enquire Vaikundarajan at Tuticorin Collectorate in the presence of 14 officials, at that time, what are the questions asked by Bedi and what are the replies given by Mr.S.Vaikundarajan and to the question of Mr.S.Vaikundarajan, Mr.Bedi also replied that there is no document, evidence, or other witnesses to establish that VV Mineral carryout the illegal mining. If that video is produced before the court, the fact will be come to light.
The reporter further discussed about the Gate Pass-I and Gate Pass-II etc., In fact, in the mining lease deed itself there is a clause that, if the lessee requested, that type of Gate Passes and Bulk permits should be issued. Hence it is not a mandatory statutory document and since the matter is pending before the Tribunal we are not ready to discuss much.
There is no quantity restriction to carryout mining operation. The only requirement is having a valid mining lease and the royalty to be paid which is complied by us.
Regarding Monazite mining policy and environmental clearance cancellation etc., since the matter is sub-judice, we cannot discuss this. But Mrs.Sandhya discuss the same only to prejudice the judiciary. For that only she got regular remuneration from our competitor. What are the facts discussed by her are not true. These all described only to make apprehension in the minds of the authorities and to prejudice the judiciary.
So kindly publish our objection in your e-paper.
Otherwise we have no other option except to take legal action against both of you.
Thanking you
Yours truly
C.Sakthi Ganapathy
Manager
No comments:
Post a Comment